University of Nairobi Faces Backlash Over Ksh50 Per Hour Work-Study Compensation
- Dalton Akumu
- Sep 4, 2024
- 2 min read

The University of Nairobi (UoN) is facing intense criticism following its announcement of a Ksh50 per hour pay rate for students participating in its work-study program. The program, which aims to help financially vulnerable students earn an income while studying, has sparked a debate about fairness and exploitation.
In a letter addressed to students, the university invited those in need to register for the work-study program, which places students in various departments for tasks assigned by supervisors. While the initiative is designed to provide financial support and skill-building opportunities, the compensation rate has been widely condemned.
Critics argue that the Ksh50 per hour wage is insufficient, especially in the current economic climate. "That's 400 a day. Labourers in construction earn more than that," remarked one online user, highlighting the disparity between the university's offer and standard labor wages. Another user called the offer "an insult to the students and a way of getting labor at a very cheap cost at the expense of the learners."
The university’s eligibility criteria require applicants to be fully registered students for the 2024/2025 academic year, with no suspensions, deferments, or disciplinary issues. Priority is given to those identified as needy or vulnerable by the Assistant Dean of Students Office.
While work-study programs are common across Kenyan public universities, compensation rates vary significantly between institutions, raising questions about the fairness of UoN's offer. The backlash underscores broader concerns about the financial struggles faced by students and the responsibility of educational institutions to support their welfare adequately.
As the debate continues, the University of Nairobi may need to reconsider its compensation structure to align with the expectations and needs of its student body, particularly in the face of rising living costs and economic challenges.
Comments